2011年12月6日星期二

高贵的苦难,火炼的灵魂――第八届"魏京生民主斗士奖"给刘迪的颁奖词




在希腊,有三个意义深刻的希腊字母 -- OXI。每年10月28日是OXI节,全希腊都为这三个字母游行纪念。这三个字母的意思是"不",它代表了人类至高无上的尊严。

这个"不"字在中文里存在以来,中国就有这样一类人,他们选择反对权威、独裁、暴政,他们用实际行动大声说"不"。以此作为人,一个心怀信念的男人或女人而生存,而不是作为一只绵羊而活着。

在当前中国充满铜臭、冷漠、腐败、自私的现状下,在中国政府持续践踏人权、压制自由之声的状态下,这些实践"不"字的人们有着特殊的困境。一个"不"字,带来的结局是长年遭遇骚扰打压,丧失健康,丧失工作权利和正常的家庭,遭受监禁,甚至献出宝贵的生命。可是,中国就是有这样一类人,他们守着贫穷、艰难、以及不被理解,更守着信念,对权威和独裁说"不":不合作、不出卖、不妥协、不低头。

因为,这是他们生存唯一的方式,一种尊贵的生存方式。

一、特殊的奖励

今年,在凛冽寒冬到来之前,又一次迎来了魏京生斗士奖的评选。在评选过程中,我们得到一个让人难过的消息,一位常年默默无闻为中国民主事业努力奋斗的志士,正在病榻上度过他最后的日子。他就是刘迪。他是30多年来坚持用实际行动实践"不"字的典型代表,他也是身处最低层、不为人知的普通老百姓。

今年,魏京生先生为这个斗士奖亲自提名,建议将2011年的奖励授予刘迪先生。他的建议得到了评委会委员的一致支持。大家认为,这样做不仅是对刘迪多年坚持不懈、不图名利、坚持反对专制政权的一代人的一种表彰,更是对不放弃信念、为中国民主自由努力奋斗的几代人的激励。让人痛心的是,在奖励公布之前,刘迪先生就与世长辞了,终年61岁。他甚至没能得知自己获奖的消息。

这是一次特殊的奖励。这是第一次正式把"魏京生民主斗士奖"奖励颁发给一个已经去世的人,也是第一次直接表彰参与四五运动和六四运动的人。魏京生先生对1976年的四五运动,1978年的民主墙运动和1989年的六四运动的意义有如下精辟的评论:

"这一连串的民主运动,是中国人民从共产党的愚民政策下逐步觉醒的过程。1976年的时候,人们已经不相信共产党的欺骗了。但当时反对共产党的人还是极少数,他们不得不借助于中共内部的分裂,拉一派打一派,借助钟馗来打鬼是当时的策略。

1978年的民主墙运动是1976年运动的继续。人们开始勇敢地把矛头指向共产党和毛泽东。但是大多数人民还对共产党抱有幻想,相信清官哲学,只反贪官而不反皇帝。人们以为换上一些好人就可以改变中国的命运。只有一小部分人知道必须改变社会制度,对一党专政不抱幻想,并愿意为此理想付出代价。

1989年,共产党军队对成千上万走上街头的人民进行了血腥的镇压。中共的屠杀彻底打碎了人们的幻想,使得所有中国人都明白了一个道理:只有推翻一党专政的政治制度,建立民主,人民才有可能翻身得解放。

现在的互联网运动使得这种觉醒扩大了范围,使得人们发现原来大家的想法差不多。互联网运动帮助酝酿了新的民主风潮,加速推动着新的人民解放运动。"

二、"小平头"刘迪

提起"刘迪"这个名字,很多人都不清楚他是谁。我手头只有薄薄的两页纸,上面写着刘迪的简历。但是,薄薄的两页纸,行行都是轰轰烈烈。原来,刘迪早已是家喻户晓的人物,只不过没人知道他的真名;原来,他一辈子坚持远离名利埋头苦干,为民主事业做了大量的工作;原来,30多年来,他年年月月面对的都是贫困艰苦的日子。

刘迪就是1976四五天安门运动中那个全国闻名的"小平头"。他是那个在反对警察镇压的事件中,带领群众呼喊口号抗议,被中共报纸点名的那个"小平头"。他作为要犯遭到了全国通缉,后来被捕入狱。

-- 刘迪1977年出狱后参与推动四五天安门事件平反活动,是参与编辑《天安门诗抄》的主要人物。
-- 刘迪是民主墙运动中著名独立刊物《北京之春》的创办人之一。
-- 刘迪也是1980年组织北京高校学生竞选运动的参与策划者之一。
-- 刘迪还协助创办了当时最大的民间独立实体,"北京社会经济科学研究所"基金会。
-- 刘迪参加了1989年天安门民主运动。作为学生顾问,参与策划、组织、协调,为天安门广场建立指挥系统和建立和平秩序,做出了特殊贡献。
-- 刘迪于1989年因六四天安门民主运动第二次被捕入狱。
-- 刘迪1990年出狱后成为政治犯亲属的主要顾问之一,为争取国际社会关注救援,停止迫害、维护人权等方面不懈地努力。
-- 刘迪多年来坚持为六四组织纪念活动,曾遭遇警察的长时间毒打。
-- 刘迪多年受迫害,因此而一直没有固定收入,生活于贫困之中。

三、中流砥柱

1976年的四五运动,1978年的民主墙运动和1989年的民主运动是自中国共产党统治以来,中国大地上发生的最惊心动魄的运动。在这几个运动中,被压制了几十年的中国人突然顶天立地,大声疾呼。中国人表现了勇敢、坚定、团结一致、不怕牺牲的可歌可泣的精神面貌!

至今,每当我们想起这个场面,都禁不住热泪盈眶。六月四日清晨枪炮响起以后,没有人说得清,又宽又长的长安街上留下了多少具勇敢无辜的尸体。那年,海内外的中国人以及全世界人民,都沉浸在无比的震惊和悲愤之中,许多人日日以泪洗面。那是一个大声说"不"的年代,一个光辉留万代的岁月!

值得一提的是,虽然1989年民主运动的主角似乎是学生,但实际上,北京和各地来声援的百姓更是中流砥柱。这些人有家有小,生活本来就很艰辛。他们经历过反右、文革,亲眼看见过反抗所带来的灭顶之灾。相对于那些"初生牛犊不怕虎"的学生们,这些平民百姓有着千百倍的理由惧怕、退缩、沉默。但是,他们却表现得无比勇敢。在64大屠杀将1989年的运动镇压之后,这些平民百姓则是遭受打压最严厉的一群。

刘迪是他们的典型代表。刘迪属于一代"老知青",也就是那些经历了非凡历史波澜,有着动荡生活的一代人。他们失去了正常的求学机会和工作机会,他们体验过家庭的变动和苦难,他们经历过后几代人无法想象的磨难。可是他们特别坚韧,也特别纯洁,保持着高尚的理想主义精神。他们对信仰有着始终如一的持守,因此在为人处事中表现得光明磊落,宽厚仁爱,吃苦耐劳。我们一点也不惊讶,刘迪在身陷牢狱、生死未卜的时刻,还千方百计把自己仅有的口粮让给坐牢的年轻学生。

当学生们的苦难渐渐化解之后,有的学生领袖出国、经商、做总裁,几乎没有一个人像刘迪那样穷困和默默无闻。每当想到这里,我们的心就会久久不能平静。我们想大声疾呼:永远不能忘记!没有刘迪这样的百姓的支持,民主运动就不会有这么灿烂的光辉!我们更不能对他们的处境无动于衷,让刘迪们这么无声无息地离去!

四、向光性和“本分”

刘迪是无声无息地离去的。他走的时候,世界上仅有很少的一些人知道,他就是赫赫有名的"小平头"。但刘迪给我们留下了很多宝贵的东西。

刘迪让我们感动的,不仅是当年的勇敢和远见,更是他后来的始终如一,以及对自我牺牲的沉默。我们惊讶地发现,刘迪是我们见过的民主人士中最为低调的一个人!

这让人不由想到了"向光性" -- 世界上众多生物都具有向光性,本能地趋向光线或愿意接近光源。在我们人类世界里,"向光性"也代表着向往名誉、地位、荣耀;期望被发现、被理解、被肯定、被赞扬。我们十分理解这个本能的向往。

但刘迪却是另类。他有意避开声誉的光源,选择长期面对黑暗。他没有试图让人知道,他就是当年那个名闻遐迩的"小平头"。他心里没有自己的功劳簿。有时我曾想,对于多年的付出和牺牲,对于被埋没、被误解、被淡忘的处境,刘迪内心是否曾有过一丝沧桑感?即使有,那也是非常合乎常理的吧?但是,我知道的刘迪总是一个样子:不抱怨、不声张、不计较、不放弃。

一次,当有人问起他在四五运动中的勇敢时,他这么回答:"当时并没想那么多,也知道肯定要失败,失败了也没好果子吃。......我只是他们中的一员,我也只是做了我应该做的份内的事,这是我的本分。什么叫做本分?好好学习就是学生的本分,种田是农民的本分,做工是工人的本分,而面对封建法西斯这样的'文化大革命',奋起造反是每一个有良知的中国人的本分。"

实际上,刘迪曾是四五运动的现场总指挥,但他又是一个"不到万不得已,不会充当领袖"的人物。他是为了解脱一个无名青年,才冲上去做了现场指挥。怀着这种"本分"的心情,尽管自四五运动以后的30多年来一直在最底层受压迫,刘迪毫无贪欲,甘于寂寞,甘于清贫,远离悲情,一直没有放弃奋斗。朋友们都知道,他在私下里做了许多事情,在危险时刻挺身而出,甚至代人"受过",却从来不出头露面。

陀思妥耶夫斯基研究痛苦时,曾经发问:“哪个更值得?是廉价的幸福,还是昂贵的痛苦?”我仿佛听到刘迪站起来大声说:"当然是昂贵的痛苦!"刘迪本能地选择后者,把为中国人受苦,当作幸福的本分。从这样的选择中,我们看到的是真正的勇气,以及罕见的气质。

五、最贫穷却最富有

刘迪去世的这些天,他的亲友们开始写一些悼念文章,我们由此对刘迪有了更全面的了解。
刘迪出身于高级知识分子家庭。他曾经有过报考历史研究生的机会,但为了《北京之春》的印刷和发行而主动放弃。虽然他从此再没有机会接受高等教育,大家却认为他是"朋友中最有学问的一个"。

他的学问,来自于年轻时代下乡时期对百姓疾苦的洞察和体验,也来自于他孜孜不倦地学习,以及对中国传统文化精髓的深切把握。这些来源,让刘迪的个性里充满了侠义、温情、爱心、谦逊。朋友们回忆说:"他经常接纳素不相识的落难人士,管吃管住,有的人一住就是几个月甚至更长。""刘迪侠骨柔肠,急公好义。他不仅维护社会正义勇于献身,而每当朋友遇到困难,他也会全力以赴为之奔波,受他帮助的人很多很多。""就是偶尔朋友聚会,刘迪也是来也匆匆,去也匆匆,飘忽不定。我很羡慕他是'神仙',过着超然脱俗、至善于行、大隐于世的日子。后来听说他在'自然之友'做公益,还救助小动物,流浪猫养了十几只......"

因为他的低调,大家甚至认为他"过得还好"。但事实上,他一辈子没有过一份正式工作,生活上靠自食其力做些临时工的工资 ,至死都是个无产者。他全部的财产就是一辆破旧的自行车。他十分克己,处处为人着想,而自己的苦处难处,甚至重病的疾苦,都不向人倾诉。

在一个为蝇头小利、蚁尾微名而锱铢必较的社会,不少人带着失明的眼睛、混乱的思维、狂躁的情绪,为个人的得失呼天抢地。另一边却静静地伫立了另一类人,像刘迪这样的一类人。他们淡泊名利,忍饥挨饿,不愿屈服;他们为着中国人自由民主的目标不懈地尽力。即便在孤独之中,也还是虽千万人吾往矣。

正因为有这样的对比,刘迪这类人的形象让我们感动万分--他们贫穷,却最富有;他们简朴,却最慷慨;他们简单,却最智慧!

六、生与死、救与赎

1976年的四五运动已经过去35年,1989年的民主运动也过去22年了。当年的坦克、硝烟、鲜血、愤怒似乎已渐渐淡去。长安街上早已是车水马龙,热闹非凡。这条大道成了许多人奔向荣誉、富有、幸福的阶梯。年轻的几代,甚至不知道四五运动和民主墙运动是什么运动,也记不清以六四屠杀告终的民主运动发生在哪一年。他们弄不懂为了什么诉求,曾有成千上万的人们敢于用自己的血肉去抵挡政府的枪炮。

在海外,不下十万中国人由于六四而获得长久居留权,从此享受自由世界的一切。可是每年六四纪念日,来人却越来越少。在中国,利益甚至让一些人放弃沉默,而选择时髦,追捧当权者。当勇敢者越来越少的时候,就会有更多的懦弱、退却、撒谎、出卖、背信弃义;就会有为了苟活而对强权的卑躬屈膝。

我想提醒大家的是,一切不幸都有其根源。真正不幸的来源,不是天灾瘟疫、外族入侵,而是我们自己的愚昧、懦弱、卑怯。当每个人都不在乎世界在他身后崩溃的时候,当每个人都不愿意承担责任的时候,世界是一定会崩溃的!我想重复过去的颁奖词里的一句话:“正是因为我们理解大多数人生存的挣扎,我们更加尊重那些勇于献身的人。他们是少数,但是他们的精神却是我们向往和追求的。”

这样的少数人现在仍然在为中国做着非凡的努力。因为有这样一批人,每年的六月四日都成了中共专制政权担惊受怕的日子。中共戒备森严,处处防范,生怕又一次引发群众运动。刘迪这类少数人的存在,是我们中国人的骄傲。他们,才是我们中国的脊梁。

今年,我们将魏京生民主斗士奖颁发给刘迪先生,是对这样坚持努力的人们的鼓励。奖金的数目并不多。但我们希望,它可以给刘迪身边的亲友们一点慰籍。这代表了大家的感谢。

虽然刘迪没有看到他努力的结果就过早地离开了,我们衷心希望人们为有这样一个品德高尚的同胞而自豪,为有这样一个保持中国文化精髓的侠骨义肠之士而感动。我们也希望刘迪的离去让人们在羞愧中苏醒,看到自己的责任。这不仅是对刘迪的最好纪念,不仅是对像刘迪这样无数死去和正在牺牲的人们表达的崇高敬意,更是对自己灵魂的一次救赎。

一名一生致力于反抗专制的民主斗士这样说过:"一个对专制和暴政屈服的人,在死以前已经死过一次了。我不应该在死以前就死,我应该在死的时候再死!"

生与死,救与赎,往往就在一念之差,往往就是在站起来大声说"不"的那个时刻。

大声地对独裁者们说"不",选择的是高贵的苦难,灵魂和肉体因此要经历炼狱般的磨炼。但,这是为正义、民主、自由所做的选择。而所有为正义、民主、自由而献身的人,都将像夜空里的美丽星辰一样,永不坠落!

谢谢大家的倾听。


魏京生基金会执行主任
黄慈萍(签署)
2011年12月5日


Wei Jingsheng Foundation News and Article Release Issue: A671-W413
魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号:A671-W413

 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Noble Suffering, Fiery Soul
-- Prize Dedication to Liu Di as Recipient of the Eighth Annual "Wei Jingsheng Chinese Democracy Champion Prize" by the Wei Jingsheng Foundation

December 5, 2011


In Greece, there are three letters of the Greek alphabet with significant meaning -- OXI.  On October 28 of every year, these three letters are celebrated and paraded, as Oxi Day (Ohi Day).  These three letters mean "no", and represent supreme human dignity.

Ever since the word "no" has existed in Chinese, the Chinese have had such people who use their actions to announce "no" against authority, dictatorship, and tyranny.  Their actions prove that they are men and women living with faith, instead of tamed lambs.

While the current China full of mercenariness, apathy, corruption, and selfishness, while there is continuous abuse of human rights and suppression of freedom by the Chinese Communist regime, the people who practice this "no" in China have special difficulties.  A word of "no" brings years of harassment and suppression, loss of right to work and normal family, imprisonment, and even the sacrifice of precious lives.  However, there are people in China who, despite poverty, difficulty, and even misunderstanding,  keep their faith and say "no" to the authority and dictatorship.  They advocate non-cooperation with the dictators, they do not sell themselves, do not compromise, and do not bow to the dictatorship -- because this is their only way of life, a noble way of life.
 __  __  __

1. A Special Award

This year, before the arrival of the cold winter, we had another round of selection for this year's "Wei Jingsheng Chinese Democracy Champion Prize".  During the selection period, we learned some sad news: a low-key perennial champion for Chinese democracy was spending his last days on his deathbed.  He was Mr. Liu Di, a typical representative who used his actions to carry out "no" in his life, especially in the past 35 years.  He is also an unknown ordinary person who is near the bottom of the Chinese society.

Mr. Wei Jingsheng himself made a nomination to award our 2011 "Wei Jingsheng Chinese Democracy Champion Prize" to Liu Di.  Wei's proposal received unanimous support from members of the judging committee at the Wei Jingsheng Foundation  We all believed that giving the prize to Liu Di would be more than just a recognition of him and the generation he represents for years of persistence against the authoritarian regime, yet without seeking fame and fortune.  It will also inspire the generations following to struggle for Chinese democracy and freedom without giving up their faith.  It was heartbreaking to learn that before our announcement of this year's prizewinner, Mr. Liu Di passed away at age 61.  He did not even know the news that he was awarded this "Wei Jingsheng Democracy Champion Prize."

Indeed, this is a special prize.  It is the first time that the Wei Jingsheng Foundation officially awarded the "Wei Jingsheng Democracy Champion Prize" to a person who has already passed away.  It is also the first time for the prize to be awarded to a person due to his direct association with both the April 5th Tiananmen Movement of 1976 and the 1989 democracy movement 13 years later.   Regarding the significance of the April 5th Tiananmen Movement of 1976, the Democracy Wall Movement of 1978, and the democracy movement that ended with the June 4 Massacre in 1989, Mr. Wei Jingsheng made following insightful comments:

"This series of pro-democracy movements illustrates the gradual awakening of the Chinese people from the obscurantist policy of the Communist Party.  In 1976, people had already begun to disbelieve in the deception of the Communist Party.  However, at that time, extremely few people openly opposed the Communist Party.  People had to use the internal divisions within the Communist Party to put one faction against the other.  It was the strategy of that time to borrow from the mythological figure of Zhong Kui (who could command tens of thousands of demons) to against ghosts and evil beings.

The 1978 Democracy Wall Movement was a continuation from the 1976 movement.  People began to boldly blame the Communist Party and Mao Zedong.  But most people still held illusions of the Communist Party.  They believed in the philosophy of a clean government and were "against the corrupted officials instead of the emperor".  Many people thought that when corrupted Communist officials were replaced by the good guys, the fate of China would be changed for the better.  Only a small number of people were aware of the need to change the social system and did not have illusions about the one-party dictatorship and were willing to pay the price for such ideology.

In 1989, the Communist military used a bloody suppression against thousands of people who went to the streets to protest.  The massacre of Chinese brothers and sisters completely shattered people's illusions and awakened them to realize the truth, that only when the political system of one-party dictatorship is overthrown and democracy is established, then could people possibly be emancipated.

The Internet nowadays is expanding the scope of this awakening and makes people realize that everyone else's thoughts are similar.  This Internet movement is helping to prepare a new road for the democratic movement, to accelerate a new people's liberation movement. "
 __  __  __

2. "The Crew Cut" Liu Di

When the name of "Liu Di" is mentioned, many people do not even know who he is.  In my hand, there are two thin layers of paper about his life.  Yet, these two pages of trekking are spectacular.  It turns out that he has been a household name for a long time as people know him by the nickname of "the crew cut" without knowing his real name "Liu Di."  It turns out that Liu Di had been hardworking and did a lot for democratic progress in China, yet kept himself truly away from fame and fortune.  After all, for more than 30 years, he had been facing poverty and hard days day and night.

Liu Di is "the crew cut" well known in China from the 1976 April 5th Tiananmen Movement.  He was named "the crew cut" by the Communist newspaper People's Daily when he was leading the people and shouting slogans of protest against police suppression during that incident.  He was wanted in the whole country as an important fugitive and was later arrested and jailed.

-- After Liu Di was released from prison in 1977, he participated in activities requesting re-addresses on the April 5 Tiananmen incident and was a main person participating in editing "Tiananmen Poems" from that incident.
-- Liu Di was one of the founders of the well-known independent publication "Beijing Spring" during the 1978 Democracy Wall movement.
-- Liu Di was one of the strategists organizing the 1980 democratic campaign for election among the college students in Beijing.
-- Liu Di also helped to found the largest private independent entity of that time, the "Beijing Institute of Social Economic Science" Foundation.
-- Liu Di participated in the 1989 Tiananmen Square democracy movement.  As a consultant to the students, he was involved in the planning, organization, coordination, and made special contributions to help setup the command system for the Tiananmen Square, and to establish peace and order.
-- Liu Di was sent to jail the second time due to his involvement in the 1989 Tiananmen democracy movement.
-- After Liu Di was released from prison in 1990, he became one of the principal advisers to the relatives of political prisoners, and worked tirelessly to get the attention and aid of the international community, to stop the persecution and to defend human rights.
-- For years, Liu Di continued to organize commemorations of the June 4 Massacre, thus receiving long time beating from the police.
-- Liu Di suffered years of persecution, therefore had no fixed income and was always living in poverty.
 __  __  __

3. The Mainstay

The April 5th Movement of 1976, the Democracy Wall movement of 1978, and the democracy movement of 1989 are the most breath-taking movements in China since Chinese Communist Party rule.  During these movements, the Chinese people who were suppressed for decades suddenly took on colossal stature and indomitable spirit to bravely speak loud.  They were able to show spirit of courage, firmness, and unity, and were not afraid of death.

Even until now, whenever we think of that, we are moved to tears.  After the gunshots in the early morning of June 4, 1989, no one could clearly tell how many brave and innocent bodies lay on that wide and long Chang'an Avenue.  That year, the Chinese people both inside China and abroad, as well as people around the world, were immersed in profound shock and grief.  Many people dropped tears day by day.  These were days of a loud "no", a brilliant period left to generations for remembrance.

It is worthwhile mentioning that, although the protagonists of the 1989 democracy movement seemed to be students, in fact the average citizens of Beijing and other places were the mainstay.  These people had families to take care of with inherent difficulty in their lives.  They experienced the systematic Communist suppressions of the anti-rightist campaign and the Cultural Revolution, etc.  They saw the overwhelming disaster resistance could bring.  In comparison to the young students who were like "young cows do not afraid of tigers", those civilians had thousands of well-founded reasons to fear, to withdraw, and to keep silence.  But these civilians behaved incomparably bravely.  After the June 4 massacre that suppressed the 1989 democracy movement, these civilians were the group that suffered the most.

Liu Di was a typical representative of these civilians.  Liu Di belonged to the generation of "old youth" who were sent to the countryside by Mao Zedong's Communist regime.  He belonged to that generation who experienced the extraordinary waves of history, and thus had very turbulent lives.  That generation lost the normal education opportunities and job opportunities.  They experienced changes and suffering in their families.  They suffered much more ordeal than the several generations of people after them.  Yet, they are particularly strong, especially pure, and keep the spirit of lofty idealism.  They have a consistent hold on the faith, so in dealing with others they are very honorable, with generous love, and hard-working ethics.  We are not surprised that when Liu Di was in prison without knowing death or life for his own future, he would do everything possible to give his limited food ration to the young students who were in prison with him.

When the suffering of the students gradually abated, some student leaders went abroad, while some others went to do business, or even become company CEO's.  Almost none of them were as poor and unknown to the public as Liu Di.  Whenever we think of this, our hearts cannot be kept quiet.  We want to appeal loudly: Never Forget!  Without the support from the average people like Liu Di, the democracy movement would not have such a splendid brilliance.  We cannot remain indifferent to their situation, and let people like Liu Di left so quietly.
 __  __  __

4. Phototropism and "Content with One's Lot"

Liu Di left this world quietly.  When he was gone, only a few people knew that he was the well-known "crew cut".  However, Liu Di has left us many valuable things.

What Liu Di moved us was not only the courage and vision he had back in 1976, but more his consistency in later years and his silence of self-sacrifice.  We were surprised to find that Liu Di is the most low-key democratic activist we have seen.

His humbleness reminds me of the opposite adjective "photo-tropic" -- many kinds of biological creatures are photo-tropic: they instinctively lean towards or are willing to get close to the light source.  In our human world, "phototropism" also represents the longing for fame, status, and glory; the expectation to be discovered, understood, to be approved, and to be praised.  We fully understand this instinctive yearning.

However, Liu Di is an alternative.  He deliberately avoided the source of reputation.  He chose to face the darkness for a long time.  He did not try to let people know that he was that famous "crew cut."  He did not mind his own laurels.  Sometimes I wonder, with all the years of effort and sacrifice while facing that buried, misunderstood, and forgotten status, did Liu Di ever had inner sadness for his vicissitudes of life?  Even so, it is very reasonable, right?  However, we know that Liu Di was always in the same: he did not complain and was quiet.  He did not care if his deserved merits were credited, and he did not give up.

Once, when someone asked him about his bravery during the April 5th Movement, he replied: "At that time, I did not think much.  I knew that we were bound to fail and would not have a good outcome.  I am just one of the people, and I just did what I should do.  It is my duty to be content with my lot.  What is the content of my lot?  Learning for a student, farming for a peasant, working for a worker.  When we are faced with such a feudal fascist type of  'Cultural Revolution', rising to rebel is the duty of every Chinese with conscience."

In fact, although Liu Di was the field commander of the April 5th Movement, he became the leader as a "last resort," the "had to be a leader" figure.  In an effort to help an unknown youth escape, he rushed to the scene to be the commander.  With this mood of "content with one's lot", Liu Di had no greed, and willingly stayed alone to be poor without pessimistic sorrow.  He never gave up his battle for democracy, despite being suppressed to the very bottom of the society since 1976.  Friends know that Liu did a lot of things in private, or came forward in dangerous times, even to be punished on behalf of others, but never wanted public limelight.

Fyodor Dostoyevsky once asked when he was studying pain: Which is more worth it?  Having cheap happiness, or noble suffering?  I can hear Liu Di stand up and loudly said: Of course the noble suffering!  Liu Di instinctively chose the latter, to suffer for the Chinese people as his content for happiness.  From this selection, we see real courage and rare temperament.
 __  __  __

5. The Poorest, Yet the Wealthiest

In the days since Liu Di passed away, his friends and relatives have begun to write articles memorializing him.  Thus we are able to get a more comprehensive understanding of Liu Di's life.

Born in a family of intellectuals, Liu Di had the opportunity to apply for graduate study in history, but gave it up in order to be able to print and distribute "Beijing Spring" magazine.  Although he never again had access to higher education, people think of him as one of the "friends who know most."

His knowledge came from his insight and experience with the plight of the people when he was in the countryside at a young age, as well as from his tireless study and a deep grasp of the essence of traditional Chinese culture.  This background made Liu Di full of chivalry, warmth, love, and modesty in his personality.  Friends recalled: "He often accepted distressed strangers into his home to take care of them.  Some people lived with him for months or even longer."  "Liu Di's chivalrous nature with his kindness made him both caring and an honorable person.  He not only had the courage to sacrifice himself in maintaining social justice, but also would give a helping hand whenever friends had difficulties.  He helped many people a lot."  "Occasionally when friends were having a party, Liu Di would come in in a rush and leave in a rush.  I am envious that he lived like a 'god', living aloof, and doing his good deeds.  Later on, I heard that he was doing public service at the 'Friends of Nature', and also rescued small animals, raising more than a dozen stray cats... "

Because of his low-key nature, people even thought that he "lived okay."  But in fact, all his life he never had a formal job.  He made some income from the wages of temporary work and was a true "proletarian" till his death.  All of his "property" was an old bicycle.  He was a very restrained and always considerate man.  Yet, he did not tell others the grievances of his own difficulties, even the suffering of serious illness.

In this society of arguing for petty wealth and tiny material lives, there are many people with blind eyes, confused thinking, and manic mood.  They would be screaming in pain for personal gains and losses.  On the other side, there are the other kind of people who stand there quietly, just like Liu Di.  They do not care about fame and fortune.  They endure hunger and poverty.  They are unwilling to yield.  They strive relentlessly for the goal of freedom and democracy in China.  Even in solitude, they still dare to fight against the army of tens of millions.

Exactly such contrast makes us deeply touched by people like Liu Di -- they are poor, yet the wealthiest; they are of little means, yet the most generous; they are simple, yet the most intelligent.
 __  __  __

6. Life and Death, Salvation and Redemption

The April 5h Movement of 1976 has been gone for 35 years now.  The 1989 democracy movement has been gone for 22 years.  Tanks, smoke, blood, and anger seems to have faded.  Chang'an Avenue in Beijing is busy and crowded again.  This avenue has become the ladder for many people running toward honor, wealth, and happiness.  Younger generations even do not know what the April 5th Movement and the Democracy Wall movement were, nor do they remember which year it was that ended a pro-democracy movement with the June 4 massacre.  They could not understand why there were tens of thousands of people having the courage to use their own flesh and blood to resist guns and canons of the government.

Abroad, no less than 100,000 Chinese obtained long-term residence due to the June 4 massacre in China and thus are now able to enjoy all that the free world has to offer.  But every year on June 4, there are less and less coming for remembrance.  In China, personal interest even makes some people give up their rights and keep quiet, and pursuit those in power like a fashion.  When there are less and less brave people, there will be more cowardice, retreat, lying, betrayal, and treachery; then one will see more obsequiousness to power for the purpose of just to live.

I would like to remind everyone that all this misfortune has its roots.  Unfortunately, the real source of misfortune in China is not due to a natural disaster, plague, or an invasion of the aliens, but due to our own ignorance, cowardice, and abjection.  When everyone does not care about the collapse of the world, when everyone is unwilling to assume responsibility, the world will certainly collapse.  I want to repeat a sentence from a previous dedication: "Exactly because one understands the struggle to survive for most people, one has more respect for those brave people who have the courage of sacrifice.  They are a minority, but their spirit is our desire and pursuit."

A small number of this kind of people are still doing extraordinary efforts in China.  Because there are such groups of people, June 4 of every year becomes a fearful day for the Communist regime.  The Communist regime is heavily guarded, always guarded, for fear of triggering another mass movement.  The existence of the minority people like Liu Di is the pride of the Chinese people.  They are the backbone and true leaders of China.

This year, we award the "Wei Jingsheng Chinese Democracy Champion Prize" to Liu Di, as our way to encourage people who have insistent and consistent effort.  Although there is not too much money associated with this award, we still hope that it helps to offer some condolence and comfort to friends and relatives around Di Liu.  It represents the gratitude people carry toward Liu Di.

Although Liu Di passed away prematurely before he saw the result of his efforts, we sincerely hope that people will be proud of this compatriot with high moral character, and be moved for a person who kept such a chivalry from the essence of Chinese culture, along with his sense of justice.  We also hope that people will move away from their shame and realize their own responsibility from Liu Di's departure from this world.  This realization would not only be the best memorial of Liu Di, and not only a way to express noble respect to countless people who have already passed away or are making sacrifices as of now, but more a way of salvation of souls for themselves.

A fighter dedicated to the fight for democracy against autocracy once said: "A person who yields to autocracy and tyranny has already died once.  I should not die so.  I must die at the time of my death."

Life and death, salvation and redemption, often result in a split second -- especially often at the moment when people stand up and say "no".

To say "no" loudly to the dictators, is to choose the noble suffering, thus one must experience hell-like suffering for one's soul and body.  Such is the choice for justice, for democracy, and for freedom.  All the people who sacrifice their lives for justice, democracy, and freedom will never fall, just as the beautiful stars shining in the night sky.

Thank you for listening.


Ciping Huang (signed)
Executive Director
Wei Jingsheng Foundation


The eighth annual "Wei Jingsheng Chinese Democracy Champion Prize" announcement:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2011/report2011-12/WJSF8thPrize111205announcementA670-W412.htm

Photos related to Liu Di and the April 5th movement of 1976:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/group1976speaker.jpg
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/LiuD1976group.jpg
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/LiuDfuneral1110Beijing.jpg

(The Wei Jingsheng Foundation is grateful to Yike CHENG for her great contribution of composing this dedication, and for her long time voluntary work and other contributions to this Foundation.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This is a message from WeiJingSheng.org

The Wei Jingsheng Foundation and the Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition are dedicated to the promotion of human rights and democratization in China.  We appreciate your assistance and help in any means.  We pledge solidarity to all who struggle for human rights and democratic governance on this planet.

You are welcome to use or distribute this release.  However, please credit with this foundation and its website at: www.weijingsheng.org

Although we are unable to afford to pay royalty fees at this time, we are seeking your contribution as well.  You may send your articles, comments and opinions to: HCP@weijingsheng.org.  Please remember, only in text files, not in attachments.

For website issues and suggestions, you may contact our professional staff and web master at: webmaster@Weijingsheng.org

To find out more about us, please also visit our websites at:
www.WeiJingSheng.org and www.ChinaLaborUnion.org
for news and information for Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and human rights and democracy movement as whole, especially our Chinese Labor Union Base.

You may contact Ciping Huang at: HCP@Weijingsheng.org or
Wei Jingsheng Foundation office at: 1-202-270-6980

Wei Jingsheng Foundation's postal address is:
Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA

You are receiving this message because you had previous shown your interest in learning more about Mr. Wei Jingsheng and the Chinese Democratic Movement.  To be removed from the list, simply reply this message and use "unsubscribe" as the Subject.  Please allow us a few days to process your request.


魏京生基金会第八届 "魏京生中国民主斗士奖"颁发公告:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2011/report2011-12/WJSF8thPrize111205announcementA670-W412.htm

有关刘迪及1976年的四五运动的相片:
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/group1976speaker.jpg
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/LiuD1976group.jpg
http://www.weijingsheng.org/pic/newsletters/newsletters2011/newsletters2011-4/LiuDfuneral1110Beijing.jpg

(程以克为本次颁奖词的主要撰稿人,魏京生基金会对她的工作表示感谢,并感谢她多年来的义务劳动及其它重要贡献。)

(魏京生基金会首发,请注明出处。www.weijingsheng.org)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
魏京生基金会及中国民主运动海外联席会议以推动中国的人权与民主为己任。
我们欢迎任何形式的帮助与贡献。我们愿与世界上为人权与民主而奋斗的人们一起努力。

我们希望您能够帮助我们散发我们的资料。但请标明出处与我们的网址:www.weijingsheng.org
欢迎投稿(暂无稿费)或批评建议,请寄信箱:  HCP@WEIJINGSHENG.ORG

魏京生基金会通讯地址:
Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA
电话: 1-202-270-6980

魏京生基金会网址:WWW.weijingsheng.org
中国民主运动海外联席会议及中国团结工会的网址为:www.ChinaLaborUnion.org

2011年12月2日星期五

胡少江:经济下行压力迫使中国政府放弃结构调整努力


2011-12-02
从十月份开始,中国总理温家宝便在不同的场合向外界释放出改变以控制通货膨胀为目的的宏观紧缩政策的信号。虽然温家宝和中央宏观经济管理部门所使用的措辞非常谨慎,尤其是竭力避免使用像“政策改变”“宽松的货币政策”等一类的字眼,而是使用更加委婉的说法,例如“预调微调”、“把握调控的节奏和力度”、“提高针对性、灵活性和有效性”等等。但是实际政策的改变在近两个月来正在陆续出台。

在货币政策层面,中国人民银行开始通过公开市场操作为银行间市场注入流动性,自十月下旬以来已经净投放人民币近两千亿元,因此推动了银行间市场利率下降。人民银行还暂停了三年期央票的发行,并且下调了央票的收益率。进入第四个季度以来,每个月新增的贷款也逐步提高。最近更是下调了金融机构人民币存款准备金率,等等。这一系列的措施都意味著货币政策正在由紧缩走向宽松。

在财政政策方面,财政部也相应地出台一些宽松的政策,例如,从十一月起提高增值税和营业税起征点。这一政策将使受到前一段紧缩政策负面影响较重的大量的小型企业有一丝喘息的机会。虽然人们普遍认为,这一政策带来的减税规模可能有限,但是它是一个政策性的风向标。经济观察家们预测,中央政府可能再今后几个月里推出更多的减税措施。

中国政府由紧缩到宽松的宏观经济政策变化,是在国际经济出现再次衰退的苗头和中国经济出现增长速度的显著下滑的情况下出现的。从国际上看,自今年三季度以来,欧美复苏势头进一步放缓,经济再次出现下滑趋势,欧元区经济衰退已成定局,美国经济“二次衰退”的迹像明显,并使严峻的就业形势更加恶化。尤其是欧洲主权债务危机尚未真正地找到解决得出口,因此导致欧元的前途出现了严重的不确定性。

这些外部的危机通过对中国出口产品需求的减少向中国的实体经济传递著巨大的压力。近几个月来中国的实体经济增长速度已经出现了明显下滑,其中出口增长速度的滑坡尤为明显。采购经理人指数(PMI)通常是衡量实体经济走向的一个重要指标,官方和民间公布的这一指标都出现了下降。虽然中国没有可靠的失业率衡量指标,但是微观层面关于参与基础设施建设的农民工和其他行业的失业问题的报道也越来越频繁地见诸报端。

自2008年以来,中国政府通过大量的政府投资使得本来就已经扭曲的经济结构更加恶化,具体表现为依靠投资和出口推动增长的模式更一步强化。前一段实行的紧缩政策正是在这一背景下出台的。

事实上,由于中国国有企业的垄断地位,紧缩政策并没有对他们产生任何实质性的影响,结构调整的努力基本没有效果。现在,新一轮的宽松的经济政策意味著那些在国民经济中具有垄断地位的国有企业和权贵企业有著更宽松的获取资源的机会,也意味著中国政府不得不再次地放弃结构调整的努力。可以预见,新的更加严重的结构扭曲将会重演,而这将会给中国经济的未来埋下更多的定式炸弹。


王克平:艾未未是当今艺术潮流的领军人

法国国际广播电台
旅居法国的华裔雕塑家王克平与他的作品。
旅居法国的华裔雕塑家王克平与他的作品。
王克平展览作品画册
作者 杨眉
中国著名艺术家艾未未的戏剧性的遭遇看来还远没有结束,在无辜失踪八十多天之后,艾未未又被判决在两周内交纳巨额罚款,在网友自发掀起捐款风潮援助艾未未交纳罚金之后,当局又指控艾未未非法在网上传播淫秽物品,这才又激起网友纷纷在网上张贴裸照,向官方集体公开自首。近日,中国官媒在攻击艾未未个人私生活的同时,又对艾未未的艺术作品发动了攻击,环球时报日前刊登评论文章,标题为“中国艺术不能只是西方的佐餐”,此前也有中国艺评人批评艾未未的作品是“中国艺术的悲哀”。
艾未未刚刚被英国著名的艺术观察杂志列为本年度全球最有影响的艺术家,艾未未的作品又多次在欧洲重要的博物馆展出,艾未未作为艺术家获得全球艺术界的公认显然已经是一个不争的事实,西方是否真的如某些人所言重政治轻艺术?现代艺术作品的评论向来是一个引发争议的话题,对艾未未的作品褒贬不一本来无可厚非,艾未未的作品究竟只能是“西方的陪衬”,还是完全可以与西方艺术家一比高低?
为此,我们请法国著名的华裔雕刻家,艾未未三十多年来的老朋友,王克平先生谈谈他对艾未未的作品以及艾未未的遭遇的看法。



木雕:沉默 。王克平:不幸的是沉默今天依然是中国人的写照。
王克平作品展览册

法广:王先生,您在上个世纪七十年代同艾未未等人一同参与了"星星美展"之后,同艾未未一直保持友好的来往,是艾未未几十年来的老朋友。您在一次访谈中曾经介绍说,十几年前,艾未未曾经在北京劝您回国发展,您当时回答说,您不太适应国内的政治气氛,当时,艾未未就劝您说,要搞艺术不要搞政治,今天再回首往事,你能够理解艾未未目前的所作所为吗?
王克平:我完全理解,因为生活在今天的中国,人们越来越难以忍耐这种专制制度,如果你不想同流合污,如果你想为自己或者为更多的人做一些事情,你肯定会走到这一步。
法广:有人批评艾未未批评政府的目的是为了出名,以此捞取资本,获得国际知名度,您怎么看?
王克平:出名和捞取资本,这本身无可厚非。艺术家都想出名。关键要看出名的目的是什么。如果出名之后为了对社会做一些有益的事情,这又有什么可谴责的呢?出名之后,你发出的声音会有更大的影响,对社会也能起到更大的推动作用。
法广:您怎么理解为什么艾未未会一下子一举成名的?
王克平:我觉得艾未未并不是民运人士,一举成名的原因主要还在于他的艺术,他的作品在国际上许多重要的大博物馆展出,而且还获得好评,这是十分罕见的。其实这才是国家应该支持的所谓的"中国的软实力".如今艾未未之所以成为全球知名的共产国家的异议人士,全是公安机关给他捧场的结果.我跟艾未未所走的艺术道路不同,在艺术创作上我们两人常常互相讥讽. 我一直不喜欢当今流行的观念艺术装置艺术,主要是其中有水平有个人性的作品太少.前两年我去草场地在他的工作室见到他刚开始制作的一堆瓷瓜子时,惊喜万分,马上预言展览必定轰动!我抓了两大把艾瓜子揣在口袋里,艾未未说你抓了我好几百块钱呀,我说岂止,多得多!艾未未走的是当今世界流行的潮流,前期的作品有一些可以看出有他人的影响,这几乎是所有艺术家探索时期的正常现象,但是,他在这个潮流的后面很快冲到了前排,而且有大手笔大成就,成为这个潮流的领军人.
法广:中国官媒环球时报近日刊登评论文章,批评艾未未的作品有一个通病,就是“宏大叙事”,说椅子一定要1千张(2007年卡塞尔),书包一定要6千个(2009年慕尼黑),葵花籽一定要一亿颗(2010年伦敦),茶一定要三吨(2011年柏林)才行,越 是在质量上欠缺,就越是在数量上做文章。您怎么看?
王克平:数字其实只是一个代号.艾未未是从一些很普通的物体出发,翻手为云,点石成金,这些物体通过数目形成一定的规模,这种规模就形成一种气势,一种独特的视觉效果,看起来简单,做成很不容易,做得绝妙那就更难啦。他从非常简单的逻辑出发,积少成多,以数量的改变导致质量的改变,他把那么简单渺小的东西,做出一定的规模,这就很有远见,很有想象力。他的许多作品实际上就是一些非常平常的东西,把它改变了用途,改变了位置,用另一种方式表现出来,一下就成为了艺术。近年来,艾未未开始关注社会问题,他很擅于小题大做,歪打正着,切中时弊,甚至连逼债举债都给艺术化,戏剧化,从行为艺术的角度来看,艾未未做得非同寻常,令全世界注目赞叹!
法广:环球时报的文章还批评艾未未的作品是在玩民俗,使用中国元素,您不觉得这正是他作品的成功所在吗?
王克平:只要作品新奇,使用什么元素都可以。实际上,艾未未的创作元素是多种多样的,他在西方生活过,他体验过中国和西方的文化,最主要的是他有他自己的发现。做一件漂亮的东西或者一件巨大的东西,这并不困难,困难的是要有自己的创造,自己的发现,自己的语言。
法广:环球时报的评论还说,即使艾未未在西方人眼中是“最著名的中国当代艺术家”,在西方也永远贴着“中国艺术家”的标签,没有一个中国当代艺术家成为西方主流美术馆的长期收藏对象,可以与西方本土当代艺术家平起平坐,成为他们真正意义上的竞争对手。"只有民族的才是世界的"。您作为一个生活在法国的中国雕刻家对此有什么看法?
王克平作品之一:木雕:女子
王克平作品展览画册
王克平:我觉得这些说法十分可笑。因为艾未未不仅是中国的最著名的当代艺术家,而且也是世界上最出色的艺术家之一,两者并不茅盾。他是中国艺术家,但他不是做中国艺术。中国艺术家与中国艺术是两个概念。被称为中国艺术家并不可耻,被称为做中国艺术那才是下级。个人性的艺术都是好的,民族性的艺术都是差的。首先要有个人性,才会有真正的的民族性,排除个人性,强调民族性是所有专制体制的一贯手段。中国当代艺术家中能够在西方最高层次的博物馆举办个人展览,而且还引起广泛的好评,这是非常难得的。艾未未能够一步登天,中国几十年没有出现这样的有世界影响的艺术家了。为什么当代艺术大师之中少有中国人,原因很简单,专制摧残了几代中华儿女,今日新芽要在焦土上伸展。连自己的国家把艺术家不当人才对待,那就不要先去谴责外国人了。爱国的人士呀,何必把"西方主流美术馆的长期收藏"做为艺术家的衡量标准,本人无一件作品被大博物馆长期陈列,但本人仍自信是世界艺术史上的一流的雕刻家。本人作品已经独树一帜,再无闲心去与他人平起平坐。在真艺术的领域是无竞争的,不是商场也不是奥运会,只有个人之分,无高低之别,苹果与香蕉孰优孰劣?再有,艾未未的一些做品是展厅所无法容纳的,有口皆碑,甚嚣尘上,才是神品。
法广:您在法国艺术界一定有不少的交往,有没有听到法国的一些艺术家对艾未未的一些看法?

王克平:
何止艺术界,艾未未的大名在巴黎几乎家喻户晓。很多人多惊叹地问我,你认识艾未未呀?我说,过去我还是他的老大哥,但现在他已远远在我之上。道高一尺,魔高一丈,艾未未也确实是很会操控舆论,可以说,是中国政府帮了艾未未的大忙,给艾未未做了多少免费的大广告,关于艾未未的国际大新闻,几乎都是出自中国警察之手,艾未未则见风使舵坐享其成。艾未未的逼债举债的行为艺术,就是一个精彩的小说和电影题材,肯定在历史上永远流传下去,而一旦具有戏剧性,那就会拐着弯地演义啦!艾未未的连续剧还在演着,好戏不断。我以前搞过戏剧,写过剧本,最难的是如何收场。这出大活戏如何收场,是喜剧还是悲剧难以预料,我估计深居中南海的导演们也是骑虎难下。在强大冷酷的专政机器下,艾未未可能会头破血流,还好文明古国历来不以成败论英雄。艾未未关押期间,我曾说他是一个活烈士。如今艾未未已经被钉在十字架上,现在我再送他一个挽联:生当人杰,死亦鬼雄。


茉莉:王若望为什么独一无二?――作家喻智官访谈录

图为王若望在纽约寓所。

引言:今年十二月十九日是王若望逝世十周年纪念日,香港溯源书社为此出版了关于王若望的传记《独一无二的反叛者——王若望传》。茉莉对旅居爱尔兰的作家喻智官进行了访谈,藉此向读者介绍《王若望传》的成书过程以及出版此书的现实意义。

  ◎ 王若望是自由民主的薪火

茉莉:喻智官先生,值此王若望逝世十周年之际,香港溯源书社推出你的大作《独一无二的反叛者——王若望传》。我先睹为快感触良多,因此想进一步了解这部传记的写作背景及有关王若望的一些人和事。首先我想问的是,是什么触发你,使你决定为王若望撰写这样一部传记?

喻智官:茉莉女士,感谢你对拙作《王若望传》的关注。
在上世纪八、九十年代的中国,王若望是与方励之和已故刘宾雁齐名的异议人士,他们竭力鼓动政治改革,宣讲自由民主,因而启蒙了一代人。后来三人同时被邓小平开除党籍,这个事件也成了八九民运的一个诱因。当时参加八九学运的学生把他们三人视为精神导师。
可惜,“六四”后王若望先坐牢后流亡,十年前在美国去世,由于中共当局的封杀,现在的年轻一代已不知王若望是谁了。在这个时候,我觉得很必要写一部介绍王若望的书,让年轻人了解为中国的自由民主奋斗过的老一辈,也为当下的中国维权和争取自由民主运动提供一份精神资源。
茉莉:这本传记的书名是“独一无二的反叛者”,这个书名很有意思。我想知道,为什么你认为王若望是独一无二的?
喻智官:我称王若望为“独一无二的反叛者”,可以分两句来解释,首先说反叛者。王若望是三八式的老革命,一九四九年后是中共十一级高干,但他几乎一直是中共党内的异议分子,按中共的标准应该称“叛徒”。在中共党内持异议的高干并非王若望一人,还有如当年和王若望一起在延安办墙报的李锐等人,这一类的老干部被称为“两头真”。但“两头真”的老干部大都是在六四后,在胡、赵改革失败后才开始异议的,而且他们中的大多数人始终留在共产党内。他们往往以“救党”的心态批评现行体制,很少修正被实践证明错误的马克思主义观点。而王若望从一九五七年起就开始认清了中共的弊端,文革后更是冲破中共的一切框框去抗争,他言行的大胆出格在同道中是独一无二的。

   ◎ 从言论到行动的彻底反叛
 
茉莉:你在书的《序》中对此作了一些解释,我还注意到你还给“反叛者”加了一个“彻底”的定语,能不能请你扼要地对此做些介绍?
喻智官:为什么说王若望是彻底的反叛者?我们先看文革结束那段日子。当时,尽管中共开始反省文革,但还是设置了不少禁区,人们普遍心有余悸噤如寒蝉,但刚刚脱帽的王若望却的左冲右突。他写文章提出各种敏感问题挑战禁忌,为此常引起文化界的巨大争议,他去各地演讲时,完全站在民间的立场上说话,无视中央约束和纪律,痛批毛泽东二十七年祸国殃民的恶行,是全国公开批毛的第一人,由此赢得了“横竖横”的美名。他还公开鼓吹中国必须补资本主义的课,必须推行多党制。此类言行触怒了邓小平,一九八七年一月,邓以上海学运为借口,开除了王若望的党籍。
但王若望没有被吓倒,反而愈战愈勇。八九民运时,王若望在香港发表致邓小平的公开信,敦促他接受学生和市民要求改革的呼声,不要暴力镇压学生民主运动,不要做历史的罪人。王若望还以“戴罪之身”几度上街游行声援学生,不惮惹上“黑手”的罪名,六四后他由此罹罪第三次坐牢。
另一反面,明知共产党最惧怕反对派成立组织,王若望仍毫无顾忌,坦然站在体制外反对派的立场。一九七九年他就参与上海《人权研究协会》的活动,后来该协会和民主墙一起被取缔。一九九一年,王若望刚出牢狱就着手恢复“人权研究协会”的活动,组织人员筹办地下刊物《民主论坛》和《人权协会》。不幸因人告密,当局将已编印的《民主论坛》封杀在印刷厂。
一九九二年,王若望去美国领奖后被迫流亡。为了表明自己和共产党势不两立的决心,他在一九九五年于纽约成立了民主党,自任主席。
王若望还百无禁忌地打破中共的一切底线。例如在有关台湾、西藏、新疆等问题上,他主张各民族在民主制度下的统一。他认为台湾本来就是中华民国,只有共产党政权和民主台湾一统,而没有倒过来之理。至于少数民族,如果中共坚持独裁专制采取无情压迫的政策,他们也有权要求独立。
   
    ◎ 屡遭迫害,其志不改

茉莉:经过你这样的分析,王若望的“彻底反叛”精神更清晰了,他的言行在中共高干的异议人士中确实是“独一无二”的。每个人都是他那个时代的产物,我因此想知道,你是如何把王若望放在时代的大背景下,去追述他的生平,展现他个性的?
喻智官:王若望处在那样严酷的社会,一旦遭难,就不是他一个人的问题,还要 影响他的亲友和家人的命运。早在延安时期,王若望就曾和三个姑娘恋爱,一个恋人以党的工作需要为理由被组织生生拆散;第二个因出身买办本人不是党员而得不到组织批准;第三个欲逃出无爱的婚姻与王若望相爱,但因对方是大人物柯庆施,他们终不能成眷属。从这里读者可以看出,早年的中共就是一个毫无人性的组织。到一九四九后,中共迫害异己镇压反对派的手段更加凶残了。
一九五七年王若望被打成右派后,他的两个弟弟也受株连戴上右派帽子,其中一个弟弟还被迫从海军退役押送回乡劳动。他的第一个妻子李明,也是三八式老干部,受牵连被逼疯,几年后,年仅四十六岁就病故了。到了文革,王若望因诅咒毛泽东被打成现行反革命,十年期间不是坐牢就是监督劳动,第二位妻子羊子为此整整等了他十年才结婚。他的子女因为是反革命家属,也难逃受歧视和侮辱的处境。
茉莉:你在《王若望传》中对王若望的恋爱婚姻也作了生动的描写,当年热恋他的几个姑娘,其敢爱敢恨的形象非常感人。尤其是李锦,她坚决要和柯庆施离婚,与王若望自由恋爱,其性格刚烈爱憎分明,简直是革命队伍中的“尤三姐”。还有年纪轻轻的女大学生羊子,她和有七个孩子、关在牢里的反革命分子王若望苦恋十年,简直就是“毛时代”的爱情传奇。书中的这些人物描写都很传神,使我在阅读时常有看小说的感觉。因此我注意到,你这部书的可读性比较强,可否请你谈谈关于此书写作的构思?
喻智官:你说书中人物给你留下深刻的印象,使我颇感欣慰,这正是我自辟蹊径写这部传记想达到的目的。
在《王若望》一书中,我没按传主从出生到终老的时间顺序一路写来,而是采用倒叙闪回等小说手法描述,这样比较符合读者的阅读趣味。
但更主要的原因是,这种写法适合王若望这个人物。因为王若望在我眼中是一位战士,战士最精彩的人生就是在疆场。就像描摹现代英武战士在战场上与敌人厮杀的那一刻;就像刻画古代神勇斗兽士搏击野兽的那瞬间,因为那一刻那瞬间,攸关战士和斗士的死生和命运,最令人瞩目揪心。所以,《王若望传》以他晚年跌宕起伏的受难开场,从中穿插几个断面追述状写他不平凡的一生。


     ◎ 作家为时代勇者代言

茉莉:从你笔下的人物形象来看,你对王若望非常熟悉,也十分认同王若望的思想和观点,否则难以把人物写得这样有血有肉。一个作家选择某个题材,总是与他自身的经历以及感情有关,我因此想知道,你和王若望先生之间是否有某种个人交往?
喻智官:说起来我和王若望本人接触并不多。一九八五年夏天,我受邀参加上海一家杂志的笔会,在会上遇到王若望,当时他因敢言而名扬上海滩。我们在一个风景区一起吃住游历了五天,在那里我和王若望曾有过几次简短的交谈。事后我记得他,但他不一定记得我。
就是在那次会上,王若望展示出的人格魅力一下子吸引了我。无论大会小会,不管座谈还是演讲,他直言不讳地指斥中共保守派的倒行逆施,指名道姓地痛批邓小平和陈云的言行。看着萧萧白发一身正气的王若望,我知道了什么是一士之谔谔,什么是无所畏惧,什么是棱棱风骨。
由于他的观点与我相契,使我更加对他推崇备至。以后,我们虽然没有机会再见面,但我一直在追踪他勇敢反抗暴政的足迹:从他被开除党籍到参与六四,到再次坐牢,到流亡海外,以及在海外的一系列行动。
因此,当我拿起笔记录王若望的人生轨迹时,有一种为他代言的感觉,写起来十分顺畅。

     ◎ 反抗暴政,至死不悔

茉莉:你在这部传记中一直强调“王若望精神”,我想知道,什么是“王若望精神”,这种精神对当今中国的现实有何意义?

喻智官:有人说王若望没有深奥的理论,也许是,但时下的中国最缺的不是“阳春白雪”的理论和说教,而是需要尖锐指出中国现实问题的目光,是明确提出与中共专制独裁斗争的方向和目标。早在二十年前,王若望就在文章中批驳把希望寄托于中共自我改良的观点,提醒人们不要受新权威主义和新保守主义者的误导,不要做天真的自欺欺人的梦。针对有人惧怕革命的心理,他坚定地指出:“中共领导层不断以‘大乱破坏稳定’来麻痹人民、恫吓大众。我们不能坠其彀中而束缚自己的手脚,或者倡议与垂死的政权谋求合作。从长远的利益着眼,只要能完成大变革的历史使命(实行多党制的议会政治)。不论是社会震荡或是局部地区的大乱,中国人民一定承受得起,即使付出不能预知的代价还是值得的。”因为“中国人民从此跳出苦海,这是历史的一次大飞跃……”这话掷地有声,透出王若望的正气、勇气、骨气,今天读来仍然有现实意义,它揭示了中共的外强中干及最终失败的命运,严正地批评了软弱和犬儒的反对派人士。
王若望还有一个可贵之处,就是,他不仅动手写文章,还动口动脚付诸行动,而且不以名人自居,不计名利得失荣辱毁誉。我说他是“将军敢当,小兵甘当”。在需要他当头时,无论在国内(六四时)还是在美国,他都走在游行队伍最前面,组织示威出阵演讲。当海外民运衰弱、被人忽略时,他也斗志不衰一如既往。2000年六四,也就是他逝世前一年,他已经八十三岁了,组织六四纪念会的人忘了他,他就当自己是一介普通老翁安然在会场独坐两小时。同年李鹏到访美国,夫人羊子开车带他前去,他从车顶伸出声援天安门母亲的牌子,冲入禁区,在李鹏下榻处抗议(见图http://www.wangruowang.org/yx.htm)。
王若望真正做到了为了推翻独裁专制政权,为了早日实现自由民主,默默奉献,生命不息,战斗不止。

茉莉:你的介绍增加了我对《王若望传》的理解,相信读者也会产生类似的共鸣,会有更多人从王若望精神中得到启发和鼓舞,去继续他未竟的民主事业。谢谢你接受访谈。
--------
原载香港《争鸣》杂志2011年12月号

页面