 |
| 鲍彤近照 |
清华有个胡教授，撰文宣称中国实行“集体总统制”。集体集体，
乱七八糟的事情多得很。去年年初，有人提出了一个「社會管理」
“政法委”这个组织，在宪法上找不到。宪法第126条规定，“
一方面是法定的，中国只有一个主席；另一方面是主旋律规定的，
中国有环保法。如果什邡钼铜冶炼厂不是依法立项的，
——原载RFA
他有點像蘇聯領袖哥爸妻夫。會把中國搞垮！搞得四分五裂！！！
回复删除Communism is already gone!!!
Capitalism is gone in the making!!!
"Democracy" without " Law and Order " without " Government Competency " is a MESS !!!
外國人已經在檢討 "Dmocracy " 那裡出了問題？！
我們呢把 "Democracy" 當作神主牌在拜！！！
The World Values Survey, a large-scale international research project, asked more than 73,000 people in 57 countries if they believed democracy was a good way to govern a country – and nearly 92% said yes. But that same survey found that in the past 10 years, around the world, there has been a considerable increase in calls for " A Strong Leader “who does not have to bother with parliament and elections” – and that trust in governments and political parties has reached a Historical Low ! It would appear that people like the idea of democracy but loathe the reality.
Trust in the institutions of democracy is also visibly declining. In the past five years, the European Union’s official research bureau found that less than 30% of Europeans had faith in their national parliaments and governments .
Countless western societies are currently afflicted by what we might call “democratic fatigue syndrome”. Symptoms may include referendum fever, declining party membership, and low voter turnout. Or government impotence and political paralysis – under relentless media scrutiny, widespread public distrust, and populist upheavals.
If you look at the recommendations of western donors, it is as if democracy is a kind of export product, off the peg, in handy packaging, ready for dispatch. “Free and fair elections” become an Ikea kit for democracy – to be assembled by the recipient, with or without the help of the instructions enclosed. And if the resulting piece of furniture is lopsided, uncomfortable to sit on or falls apart? Then it’s the fault of the customer.
That elections can have all kinds of outcomes in states that are fragile, including violence, ethnic tensions, criminality and corruption, seems of secondary importance. That elections do not automatically foster democracy, but may instead prevent or destroy it, is conveniently forgotten.